ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2024
Initial evaluation of an intervention to address provider implicit bias in pediatric sickle cell disease pain care: A mixed methods pilot study.
Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Experiences of Acute Pain Communication in Sickle Cell Disease and Perspectives on Improving Clinician Communication.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Black Youth and Caregiver Experiences of Racism in Pain Management: A Narrative Inquiry.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Health equity in sickle cell disease: overcoming barriers to care in marginalized communities.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Patient Perspectives on Enhancing Clinician Communication About Pain in Sickle Cell Disease.Research square · 2025Article
- Editorial to accompany the special issue: Social and health inequities in chronic pain across the life span.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health care provider (HCP) implicit bias can impact health outcomes for youth with sickle cell disease (SCD). Aims: : The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of an individuation and perspective-taking (IPT) intervention to decrease implicit bias and improve pain treatment clinical decision making in pediatric SCD HCPs. Methods: This mixed methods pilot randomly assigned HCPs ( Results: No significant differences in scores on bias measures across time, condition, or the Condition × Time interaction were found (all Conclusions: This study is the first to evaluate an IPT intervention in pediatric SCD HCPs. HCPs deemed the intervention feasible, acceptable, and impactful and suggested areas for improvement. Future research should refine the intervention to incorporate greater patient involvement and skills practice to improve health outcomes for this underserved population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.