ArticleFrontiers in education2025
Understanding the complexities of financial support for students in grant-funded STEMM training programs.
Article in Frontiers in education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: There are lessons to be learned from campuses providing financial support to students involved in grant-funded science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) training initiatives. We examine students' perspectives on financial support from the Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) program, funded by the National Institutes of Health. Methods: We analyzed qualitative data collected from 122 BUILD undergraduate participants during site visits to the 10 NIH-sponsored BUILD programs using generic qualitative inquiry. Results: Using Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to guide qualitative data analysis, we found that students perceived BUILD funding to reduce financial stress and increase access to career training; however, the impact of aid was hampered by limitations in funding and financial aid processes. Discussion: Findings from this study reveal that financial support from BUILD often facilitated college entry and participation in biomedical research training experiences for students. While students viewed financial support as beneficial to their academic and professional trajectory, they also noted challenges with financial aid processes on campus. This study has implications for federal funding agencies, foundations, and higher education institutions, specifically in developing innovative disbursement processes to improve support and to reduce unintended harmful consequences for student recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.