Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357318›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Total Knee Revision Using the Midvastus Approach: A Case Report.

Rayan Jamal, Hatem A Shaqroon

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rayan JamalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Medina, SAU.
Hatem A ShaqroonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahad Hospital, Ministry of Health, Medina, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common procedure for managing severe knee osteoarthritis. However, component loosening continues to be a common issue, frequently requiring revision surgery. Although the medial parapatellar (MPP) approach is commonly used due to the broad access it provides, it may disrupt the extensor mechanism and reduce blood flow to the patella. We present a case of a 62-year-old woman who required revision TKA (RTKA) on the left knee due to tibial component loosening seven years after her initial surgery, which had been performed via the MPP approach. We have used the midvastus (MV) approach to preserve the quadriceps tendon. This case highlights the MV approach as a viable alternative in RTKA, offering adequate exposure while minimizing soft tissue damage.

Indexed as

component looseningknee osteoarthritismidvastus approachrevision tkatotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID40357318
PMCPMC12067497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.