ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical application of a novel hysteroscopic LNG-IUS non-suture fixation at the uterine fundus.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- GyneFix levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for Chinese patients: a preliminary retrospective self-controlled observational study.BMC women's health · 2026Observational
- Anchoring levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus suture fixation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review and Risk-Stratification Framework for Preventing LNG-IUS Expulsion in Adenomyosis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- A novel LNG-IUS suture fixation method utilizing the hysteroscopy cold knife system: nail-type anchoring suture.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the feasibility and clinical effects of a novel hysteroscopic levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) non-suture fixation at the uterine fundus. Methods: From October 2023 to July 2024, a prospective study involving a novel hysteroscopic LNG-IUS non-suture fixation at the uterine fundus was conducted at Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University. The patient's clinical symptoms, surgical time, surgical complications, postoperative LNG-IUS expulsion, and other follow-up information were recorded. Results: A total of 31 patients were included in this study. The average uterine depth is 9.17 ± 0.67 cm. Among them, 10 cases had a history of LNG-IUS expulsion. The average surgical time is 13.0 ± 4.1 min, and the average intraoperative blood loss is 5.3 ± 3.6 mL. All patients did not experience complications such as uterine perforation, massive bleeding, fluid overload, or postoperative infection. The average follow-up time after surgery was 6.0 ± 1.8 months, and no LNG-IUS expulsion occurred. The pain assessment and mean menstrual flow postoperation were less than preoperation, and the endometrial thickness and mean uterine volume postoperation were lower than preoperation, with statistically significant differences. For patients with dysmenorrhea, the postoperative relief rate was 96.3% (26/27), and for those with excessive menstruation, the postoperative effective rate reached 96.2% (25/26). The main adverse reaction was irregular vaginal bleeding, with an incidence rate of 61.3% (19/31). Conclusion: Hysteroscopic LNG-IUS non-suture fixation at the uterine fundus is a safe and effective technique, particularly suitable for patients with dysmenorrhea, excessive menstruation, or a large uterine cavity who have previously experienced LNG-IUS expulsion. This procedure is simple and minimally invasive, has a short surgical time, has minimal bleeding, and provides rapid recovery; therefore, it is worthy of clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.