ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Oliceridine and Hydromorphone for Postoperative Analgesia in Adults Undergoing Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Effects of hydromorphone for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postpartum depression and sleep disorders after cesarean section: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Effects of hydromorphone-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postpartum depression after cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Trial
- Esketamine during anesthesia induction improves early postoperative sleep quality in female patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A randomized trial.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone in postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for orthopedic surgery patients, offering a reference for postoperative pain management in this patient population. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial involving 80 patients aged 23 to 64 years undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. All participants were randomly assigned to the test group (Group H) and the control group (Group C) by the random number table method. In Group H, hydromorphone (0.2 mg/kg) and palonosetron (4 μg/kg) diluted to 150 mL with saline were used for PCIA, while in Group C, sufentanil (2 μg/kg) and palonosetron (4 μg/kg) were diluted to the same volume. Postoperative pain was assessed using the resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The total and effective PCIA button presses within 48 h, along with the number of remedial analgesia cases, were recorded. Ramsay, Awakening time, extubation time, hospital stay duration, and adverse events within 48 h postoperatively were also recorded. Results: Compared to Group C, Group H had significantly lower VAS scores at 2 and 6 h, as well as Ramsay, SDS, and PSQI scores at 24 and 48 h postoperatively (all Conclusion: Hydromorphone-based PCIA enhances early postoperative pain relief in orthopedic surgery patients, alleviates postoperative depression and sleep disturbances, and reduces the incidence of dizziness and drowsiness. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial. Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) on 01/04/2024 (ChiCTR2400082567).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.