ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Chiropractic students' views on needle stick injuries and protocols at a South African university.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Needle stick injuries (NSIs) pose serious occupational risks for health professionals and students, with psychological and physical consequences. Despite increased awareness, NSIs persist. Research focussing on chiropractic students' perspectives on NSIs and related protocols is limited, in South Africa and internationally. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of chiropractic students towards NSIs and related protocols. Setting: This study was undertaken at the Chiropractic Department, University of Johannesburg. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, quantitative study involving an adapted anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to undergraduate Bachelor of Health Sciences and postgraduate Master of Health Sciences (BHSc and MHSc) chiropractic students. Data were analysed using frequencies, descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations to identify relationships in the data. Results: The respondents ( Conclusion: Chiropractic students exhibited good NSI knowledge, postgraduates more so, but attitudes and reporting behaviours' varied. Enhanced, standardised education on the urgency of reporting NSIs is recommended to improve protocol and safety practices. Future research should explore long-term NSI protocol adherence. Contribution: This study provides important baseline South African data on perspectives of NSI in a chiropractic student cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.