ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Perinatal clients' experiences of care during COVID-19 in the North West District, South Africa.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected perinatal care services globally, leading to World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation for six in-person and two virtual antenatal visits to reduce travel and antenatal visits. Changes were made to reduce infection risk, with online consultations becoming a popular interim measure. Aim: The aim was to understand perinatal clients' experiences of perinatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Setting: The study was conducted in five facilities of Bojanala district in the North West province, South Africa. Methods: The study followed a qualitative, exploratory, contextual design using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. Purposeful sampling was used to select 10 participants meeting the inclusion criteria, who were interviewed until data saturation was reached. Data were organised into themes using thematic analysis. Ethical considerations and measures of trustworthiness were adhered to. Results: Three themes emerged altered routine, staff attitude and isolation during delivery. The nine sub-themes were pre-screening, entering the facility in turns, infection prevention and control, very slow queues, discontent about wearing masks, nurses' fear of infection, staying longer than 5 h in the queue only to receive less than 10 min of service, no visitors including spouses allowed for emotional support, and compulsory COVID-19 test. Conclusion: South Africa should revisit policies and guidelines to support pregnant women during the difficult phases of unforeseen pandemics. Contribution: Multidisciplinary involvement in the psychological support of antenatal clients and nurses during any pandemic is crucial to ensure mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.