ArticleHemaSphere2025
Biomarker-adapted treatment in high-risk large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of cell-free DNA in lymphomas: from sample collection to genotyping and minimal residual disease monitoring.Blood advances · 2026Review
- A targeted circulating tumor DNA landscape of copy number aberrations in large B-cell lymphomas.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Continuous tobacco smoking increases mortality in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma but not follicular lymphoma, a Finnish population-based study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- The prognostic and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival rates for patients with high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), particularly those with biological risk factors, remain inadequate. We conducted a biomarker-driven phase II trial involving 123 high-risk patients aged 18-64 with LBCL. Based on their biological risk profiles, patients received either R-CHOEP-14 (without risk factors) or DA-EPOCH-R-based regimens (with risk factors). Biological high-risk factors included
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.