ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Collective phases and long-term dynamics in a fish school model with burst-and-coast swimming.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collective Behavior in Medaka Fish Depends on Discrete Kinematic States of Swimming Behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Collective phases and long-term dynamics in a fish school model with burst-and-coast swimming.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intermittent and asynchronous burst-and-coast swimming is widely adopted by various species of fish as an energy-efficient mode of locomotion. This swimming mode significantly influences how fish integrate information and make decisions in a social context. Here, we introduce a simplified fish school model in which individuals have an asynchronous burst-and-coast swimming mode and selectively interact only with one or two neighbours that exert the largest influence on their behaviour over a limited spatial range. The interactions consist of a fish that is attracted to and aligned with these neighbours. We show that, by adjusting the interactions between individuals above a sufficiently high level, depending on the relative strength of attraction and alignment, the model can produce a cohesive fish school that replicates the main collective phases observed in nature: schooling, milling and swarming when each individual interacts with only one neighbour; and schooling and swarming when each individual interacts with two neighbours. Moreover, the model showed that these patterns can be maintained over long simulations. However, with the exception of swarming, these patterns do not persist indefinitely, and fish lose cohesion and progressively disperse. We further identified the mechanisms that lead to group dispersion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.