Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357185›Full record

ReviewJournal of public health in Africa2025

Health and care workers' perceptions of PPE and physical distancing for COVID-19: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

Dachi I Arikpo, Afiong O Oku, Okwu A Onyema, Edward O Odey, Hannah Hamilton-Hurwitz, João P Toledo, Kathleen Dunn, April Baller, Helen J Smith, Martin M Meremikwu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dachi I ArikpoCochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9035-9193
Afiong O OkuDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-2821
Okwu A OnyemaDepartment of Sociology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7696-3570
Edward O OdeyDepartment of Social Science Education, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-360X
Hannah Hamilton-HurwitzWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0753-3400
João P ToledoWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-1794
Kathleen DunnWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-3712
April BallerWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8207-8423
Helen J SmithInternational Health Consulting Services Ltd, Merseyside, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6252-3793
Martin M MeremikwuCochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-9413

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the effectiveness of personal protective equipment (PPE) and physical distancing interventions for COVID-19 infection prevention and control (IPC), low uptake among health and care workers persists. Aim: To synthesise evidence from primary qualitative research exploring the perceptions and experiences of health and care workers on the use of PPE and physical distancing in the context of COVID-19. Setting: Healthcare settings including care homes. Method: An electronic database search was conducted using search terms based on the inclusion criteria, and the search strategy was peer-reviewed by a team of information scientists. Thirty qualitative studies were sampled after eligibility screening independently by two review authors. Synthesis was performed using the thematic synthesis approach. The confidence in each review finding was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations; Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Results: Fifteen analytical themes were identified. Health and care workers valued the use of PPE in patient care. The sense of value was heightened by perceived susceptibility to infection with COVID-19, the need to deliver optimal patient care and the desire to protect family members. Service delivery, clinical workflows, the absence of visual cues for spatial separation and physical infrastructure hindered adherence to physical distancing guidelines. Conclusion: The gap between IPC guidelines and their implementation is an important health system barrier to PPE use and physical distancing in healthcare settings. Contribution: This review provides useful insights on key considerations for planning and implementing IPC in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19infection prevention and controlmasksphysical barriersphysical distancingPPEqualitative evidence synthesisqualitative studiesSARS-CoV-2systematic review

Identifiers

PMID40357185
PMCPMC12067588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.