ArticleSouthern African journal of infectious diseases2025
Bacteria and yeasts of nosocomial importance in a radiology department in an academic hospital.
Article in Southern African journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) result in a significant burden on the healthcare sector. Investigations into their epidemiology and possible routes of transmission are important to enable interventions that protect patients and staff. Radiology devices are known to be colonised by microbial organisms that may act as fomites for infection. However, there is a lack of relevant data from the South African setting. Objectives: The study aimed to determine deficiencies in infection control practices and the microbial colonisation rates and resistance profiles of devices within a radiology department. Method: A cross-sectional, single-centre study was conducted in a radiology department in Johannesburg, South Africa. An infection prevention and control (IPC) audit was performed, and 143 swabs were collected. Swabs were cultured according to standard microbiological techniques, and focused antimicrobial resistance testing was performed. Results: Infection prevention and control practices did not align with manufacturer recommendations. A total of 29 positive swabs were obtained (20.3%). Of these, 93.1% ( Conclusion: The detection of pathogenic organisms demonstrates the possibility of microbial transmission between patients within the department. Infection control practices are noncompliant and require improvement to mitigate this risk. The threat of microbial dissemination remains. Contribution: This study demonstrates the prevalence of microbes in a South African radiology department, underscoring the risk of microbial dissemination because of inadequate decontamination practices between patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.