Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357152›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Unveiling nitrogen preferences in

Chu-Sheng Lu, Jia-Jun Lai, Xian-Ting Fan, Kai-Ming Liang, Yuan-Hong Yin, Qun-Huan Ye, Hong Shen, You-Qiang Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chu-Sheng LuRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jia-Jun LaiRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xian-Ting FanRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Kai-Ming LiangRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan-Hong YinRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Qun-Huan YeRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hong ShenSouth China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
You-Qiang FuRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Do Methods: For the first time, this study classifies Result: Compared to ammonium-only nutrition, a mixed ammonium-nitrate treatment significantly boosted root and shoot growth, while nitrate-only nutrition led to a decline in chlorophyll content. Compared with the 100:0 treatment, the maximum root length, shoot length, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and total dry weight in the 75:25 treatment significantly increased by 29.85%, 4.11%, 7.65%, 1.71% and 3.03% (p < 0.01), respectively; and the SPAD value in the 0:100 treatment significantly decreased by 4.22% ( Discussion: These results demonstrate distinct responses of rice cultivars to different nitrogen treatments. Through correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses, the rice cultivars were categorized into three types: ammonium-preferring type (APT), ammonium- and nitrate-preferring type (ANPT), and nitrate-preferring type (NPT). The APT, ANPT, and NPT showed the highest biomass in the 100:0, 75:25, and 0:100 treatments, respectively, with the biomass in the ANPT significantly exceeding that of the APT (

Indexed as

ammonium and nitrate preferencesammonium-nitrate mixed nutritionbiomassclassification of indica cultivarsnitrogen treatments

Identifiers

PMID40357152
PMCPMC12066440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.