ReviewBMJ neurology open2025
Long-read sequencing for diagnosis of genetic myopathies.
Review in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore Sequencing for Chikungunya Virus: Principles and Application.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Targeted long-read sequencing enables comprehensive analysis of the genetic and epigenetic landscape of inherited myopathies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Molecular Bases of Myopathies and Their Impact on Clinical Practice: Advances and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic myopathies are caused by pathogenic variants in >300 genes across the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Although short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionised the diagnosis of genetic disorders, large and/or complex genetic variants, which are over-represented in the genetic myopathies, are not well characterised using this approach. Long-read sequencing (LRS) is a newer genetic testing technology that overcomes many of the limitations of NGS. In particular, LRS provides improved detection of challenging variant types, including short tandem repeat (STR) expansions, copy number variants and structural variants, as well as improved variant phasing and concurrent assessment of epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation. The ability to concurrently detect multiple STR expansions is particularly relevant given the growing number of recently described genetic myopathies associated with STR expansions. LRS will also aid in the identification of new myopathy genes and molecular mechanisms. However, use of LRS technology is currently limited by high cost, low accessibility, the need for specialised DNA extraction procedures, limited availability of LRS bioinformatic tools and pipelines, and the relative lack of healthy control LRS variant databases. Once these barriers are addressed, the implementation of LRS into clinical diagnostic pipelines will undoubtedly streamline the diagnostic algorithm and increase the diagnostic rate for genetic myopathies. In this review, we discuss the utility and critical impact of LRS in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.