ReviewCureus2025
Safety and Efficacy of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cells Generated Using DNA Transposon Systems: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Overview of Cellular Therapeutics Clinical Trials: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a potentially curative approach for hematological malignancies. The DNA transposon system represents a non-viral approach to CAR T-cell generation, offering several advantages including low immunogenicity, scalability, and cost-effectiveness over existing methods. Despite significant clinical advances, no meta-analysis has been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DNA transposon-generated CAR T-cells. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DNA transposon-generated CAR T-cell therapy across B-cell malignancies. A systematic literature search was conducted through databases, PubMed, Google Scholar, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar, from 2012 to January 2024. A total of seven studies encompassing 110 patients were found eligible. The pooled analysis demonstrated an overall response rate of 75%, with a complete response achieved in 66% of patients. Moreover, 49% of patients demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) with a median follow-up of 30 months, and 53% of patients achieved negative measurable residual disease (NMRD) remission. Notably, few patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of grades 1-2; however, neurotoxicity was not described as a prevalent side effect. DNA transposon-generated CD19 CAR T-cell therapy demonstrates promising efficacy in B-cell malignancies, with favorable safety profiles. However, the outcomes of this meta-analysis underscore the need for further clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.