Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357065›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Physical Activity Assessment in Patients With Nephrotic Syndrome and the Impact of COVID-19: A Study Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and Accelerometry.

Hiroki Nishiwaki, Sho Sasaki, Daisuke Ichikawa, Yugo Shibagaki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Fumihiko Koiwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hiroki NishiwakiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, JPN.
Sho SasakiDepartment of Nephrology, Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, JPN.
Daisuke IchikawaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, JPN.
Yugo ShibagakiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, JPN.
Takeshi HasegawaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology (iCE), Showa Medical University, Tokyo, JPN.
Fumihiko KoiwaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Nephrotic syndrome (NS) typically involves proteinuria, reduced levels of albumin in the blood, and swelling. It may also lead to complications, including an increased risk of thrombosis and a decline in kidney function. While pharmacological treatments are primary, physical activity (PA) may play a role in improving outcomes. However, limited data exist on PA levels in patients with NS, particularly regarding the validity of self-reported PA assessments. The COVID-19 pandemic also introduced significant lifestyle changes, potentially impacting PA and kidney function. This study aimed to (1) compare self-reported PA using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with objectively measured PA via accelerometry in patients with NS and (2) evaluate changes in PA and kidney function before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This multicenter cohort study recruited outpatients aged ≥15 years with primary NS between 2019 and 2020. Participants completed IPAQ and wore accelerometers for at least seven days. PA intensities were categorized as light PA (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), or sedentary behavior (SB). The association between IPAQ and accelerometers by activity measurement method describes the values measured for each activity intensity and shows the correlation coefficient. Kidney function was assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR). PA and kidney function were compared before (December 2019 to March 2020) and during (June to December 2020) the pandemic. Results Seventeen participants were included in the IPAQ-accelerometer comparison, and eight were analyzed for pre-pandemic versus pandemic PA changes. Across all intensity levels, IPAQ tended to underestimate PA compared to accelerometers, but this was not statistically significant (IPAQ vs. accelerometer in total PA: 56.6 vs. 652.6 min/day, p = 0.56). IPAQ showed no correlation with accelerometer-measured LPA but demonstrated a moderate correlation with MVPA. During the pandemic, MVPA decreased by 0.88% (95% CI: -5.08 to 3.33%), while SB increased by 0.59% (95% CI: -10.1% to 11.3%). Step count decreased by 810 steps/day (95% CI: -3,597 to 1,977). Kidney function remained stable, with eGFR decreasing by 4.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.98) and UPCR increasing by 1.9 g/gCre (p = 0.17), although these changes were not statistically significant. Conclusions IPAQ underestimated PA compared to accelerometry, particularly for low-intensity activity. During the pandemic, PA decreased, while sedentary time increased, although kidney function remained stable. These findings highlight the need for objective PA measurement in patients with NS and suggest that pandemic-related lifestyle changes may have influenced PA behaviors. Further research is warranted to assess the long-term impact of PA on kidney outcomes in this population.

Indexed as

accelerometerinternational physical activity questionnairekidney functionnephrotic syndromephysical activityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40357065
PMCPMC12067144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.