ArticleCureus2025
Interfinger Differences in Pulse Oximetry Signal-Derived Peripheral Perfusion Index: A Single-Center Exploratory Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeripheral perfusion monitoring is crucial for the management of critically ill patients because abnormal peripheral perfusion is associated with a poor prognosis. The peripheral perfusion index (PPI), derived from pulse oximetry, quantifies peripheral perfusion but varies across fingers. A pulse oximeter probe may cause burns when worn at the same site. Therefore, changing the site has been recommended. However, changes in PPI values owing to probe replacement reduce the reliability of clinical and research applications. No two fingers with equivalent PPI values have been identified yet. This study assessed the interfinger differences in PPI by measuring the five fingers simultaneously and identified the two fingers with the least fluctuation in values.
methodsA total of 30 healthy volunteers were included in this single-center prospective exploratory study. For PPI measurements, the pulse amplitude index (PAI) was measured using a pulse oximeter on a bedside monitor (Life Scope PT; Nihon Kohden Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The tape-type disposable pulse oximeter probes were attached to each of the five fingertips of the dominant hand, and measurements were conducted in three rooms with different temperatures (16°C, 22°C, and 28°C) to induce thermoregulatory responses and capture a wide range of PAI values. The primary endpoint was the PAI in pairs of two fingers each (a total of 10 pairs). Paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare finger pairs, with statistical significance defined as
resultsThe combination with the least difference in PAI was the index-ring finger combination (0.07% ± 1.89%,
conclusionPPI values measured using the pulse oximeter showed the smallest interfinger difference between the index and ring fingers. If changing the finger to which the probe is attached during clinical or research use is needed, it may be possible to consistently measure the PPI values by alternately attaching the probe to the index and ring fingers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.