ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association between dietary index for gut microbiota and osteoarthritis in the US population: the mediating role of systemic immune-inflammation index.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights into gut microbiota dysbiosis in osteoarthritis based on the gut-joint axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most prevalent chronic conditions among the elderly. The dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) is a novel proposed indicator reflecting gut microbiome diversity. However, the role of DI-GM in OA remains unclear. This study thus aims to explore the association between DI-GM and the risk of OA and analyze the mediating roles of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Methods: We utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2007-2018. OA was assessed through self-reported questionnaires, and dietary recall data were used to calculate the DI-GM. Univariate and weighted multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to evaluate the association between DI-GM and OA, the weighted linear regression analyses were employed to investigate the association of DI-GM with SII, while restricted cubic splines (RCS) curves were used to assess the non-linear relationship between these variables. Subgroup analyses were subsequently conducted to validate the robustness of the findings. Mediation analysis evaluated the role of SII. Results: This study included 15,875 participants, revealing a significant inverse association between the DI-GM and OA risk ( Conclusion: This study found a significant negatively association between DI-GM and OA prevalence in the US population. Mediation analyses demonstrated a significant mediating effect of SII.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.