ReviewInternational journal of women's health2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions Related to the Treatment of Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Scoping Review.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of mineral supplements (magnesium, chromium, zinc, selenium, chromium picolinate) in reducing insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring lifestyle management in polycystic ovary syndrome through implementation frameworks.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects up to one-in-five reproductive-aged women and its global healthcare-related economic burden is substantial. The aim of this review was to summarise evidence of the cost-effectiveness of interventions related to the treatment of women with PCOS. Evidence Acquisition: Six academic databases were systematically searched for relevant records. Cost data were extracted, and an interpretation statement was provided for each study based upon the cost difference or incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and its statistical significance. Evidence Synthesis: The search yielded 10 relevant studies. Only one study was conducted in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC), China. Nine studies focused on infertility treatment, and one study related to pregnancy care. There remains uncertainty regarding cost-effectiveness of the following infertility treatments: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles compared to ovulation induction (OI) cycles in women with clomiphene citrate (CC) resistant PCOS; and urinary follicle stimulating hormone compared to recombinant follicle stimulating hormone for OI. There are likely cost savings associated with laparoscopic ovarian drilling compared to OI with gonadotropins in women with CC-resistant PCOS, as well as with artificial cycle-frozen embryo transfer (AC-FET) without gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pre-treatment compared to AC-FET with GnRH-a pre-treatment in women with PCOS. Treatment with metformin was lower cost and more effective compared to no treatment for achieving normal glucose regulation without developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: The high proportion of fertility-related treatment studies reflects reproductive features often being the best-recognised feature of PCOS. However, limited evidence is available from LMICs. Further economic evidence is needed regarding PCOS treatments, particularly lifestyle interventions treating outcomes other than infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.