ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2025
Operational risk management during disasters: A case of South African tourism small businesses.
Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resilience through the integration of governance, lived experience, and knowledge.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small businesses, which were disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, often lack the resources for effective operational risk management (ORM), with existing frameworks like International Standardization Organization (ISO) 31000 proving too complex and resource-intensive. There is, however, still minimal research into ORM frameworks tailored to the needs of Small, Micro, and Medium Enterprises (SMMEs) facing disaster risks. This study developed and evaluated a tailored ORM framework for SMMEs to manage operational risk exposures from future disasters like COVID-19. A simplified approach was proposed, consisting of three stages: risk identification or disaster preparedness, risk analysis or disaster learning and risk treatment or building enterprise resilience. The framework was empirically tested on data from 208 tourism industry SMMEs using a quantitative research approach. Correlation analysis, structural equation modelling (SEM) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used to assess the framework's applicability to businesses of different ages, sizes and subsectors. Results from correlations and SEM confirmed the proposed ORM framework's effectiveness in explaining disaster preparedness, learning and resilience for SMMEs. Additionally, ANOVA results showed the framework was equally applicable across business subsectors, but across business age and size, it was not equally applicable. Larger and older businesses were able to implement disaster learning and resilience better than younger and less resourced businesses. Contribution: This research advances ORM within tourism SMMEs, proposing a simplified process validated by empirical findings demonstrating its effectiveness in proactive risk management and resilience during disaster incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.