ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Access to Medical Residency: A Qualitative Study of Medical Graduates' Experiences in Georgia.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Strategic planning for the health workforce-particularly in emerging middle-income countries like Georgia-is essential for maintaining an effective healthcare system. Medical residency training is crucial for developing a well-rounded healthcare workforce equipped with the competencies needed to deliver high-quality care and maintain a balance of specialties. Understanding the enrollment process and experiences of medical graduates in residency programs can help identify areas for improvement. These insights can inform interventions to develop a physician workforce that aligns with population needs and remains responsive to the evolving healthcare system. We aimed to explore the experiences of medical graduates navigating Georgia's residency enrollment process, as well as residents' postgraduate training experiences, to identify key areas for improvement. Additionally, we examined attitudes towards enrolling in residency programs abroad to better understand the potential impact on the ongoing phenomenon of "brain drain." Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design based on individual interviews, conducted via Zoom. We explored the experiences and perceptions of residency enrollment among a purposefully selected sample of 10 participants using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: We identified six overarching themes. Participants described the placement exam as being of suboptimal quality and reported challenges in navigating the enrollment process, often accompanied by emotional stress. Working in residency without a salary was considered unfair and posed an economic burden. The absence of structured mentorship further contributed to dissatisfaction, prompting several participants to consider alternative career paths or pursue residency opportunities abroad. Conclusion: Georgia's medical residency enrollment process requires greater transparency and reduced burdens on aspiring professionals to attract the most qualified candidates. Policy reforms and strategic initiatives should promote socioeconomically equitable access to residency programs and address concerns related to "brain drain," ultimately supporting the development of a sustainable healthcare workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.