ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Gastrointestinal injury in cardiopulmonary bypass: current insights and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Correction to "Outcomes in Patients Requiring Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Cardiac Surgery: An Analysis From the PELS-1 Study".Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Breaking the Barrier: Pro-inflammatory Stool from Infants with CHD Triggers Barrier Dysfunction within Intestinal Organoids.Research square · 2026Article
- Gut microbiome alterations and hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS in liver cirrhosis patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is an essential component of cardiac surgery. As CPB technology continues to advance and innovate, it has enabled the expansion of surgical boundaries and the resolution of many previously inoperable challenges. However, the occurrence of various complications during CPB warrants attention, with their prevention and management being paramount. The gastrointestinal tract, directly connected to the external environment, is vulnerable not only to external factors but also to internal changes that may induce damage. Both preclinical and clinical research have demonstrated the incidence of gastrointestinal injuries following CPB, often accompanied by dysbiosis and abnormal metabolic outputs. Currently, interventions addressing gastrointestinal injuries following CPB remain insufficient. Although recent years have not seen notable progress in this field, emerging academic research underscores the essential role of the gut microbiome and its metabolic products in sustaining overall health and internal equilibrium. Notably, their significance as the body's "second genome" is increasingly recognized. Consequently, reevaluating the gastrointestinal damage post-CPB, alongside the associated dysbiosis and metabolic disturbances, is imperative. This reassessment carries substantial theoretical and practical implications for enhancing treatment strategies and bettering patient outcomes after CPB. This review aims to deliver a comprehensive synthesis of the latest preclinical and clinical research on CPB, address current challenges and gaps, and explore potential future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.