ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2025
Reflexed cryptococcal antigenaemia detection rates in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reflexed cryptococcal antigenaemia (CrAg) testing has been offered on remnant CD4 specimens with a count < 100 cells/µL from 2017 in South Africa. The Western Cape is the only province to introduce CrAg testing for counts of 100 cells/µL to 200 cells/µL. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the reflexed CrAg detection rate in the Western Cape. Method: The retrospective analysis of laboratory data for reflexed CrAg testing was conducted between September 2022 and May 2024. The CrAg detection rate was reported for the following CD4 categories at the provincial, district, and sub-district levels: (1) < 100 cells/µL, (2) ≥ 100 cells/µL - ≤ 200 cells/µL, and (3) ≤ 200 cells/µL. Results: Data are reported for 80 809 specimens, with a CrAg detection rate of 4.0% for a CD4 ≤ 200 cells/µL compared to 6.2% for a count < 100 cells/µL. For a count of ≥ 100 cells/µL - ≤ 200 cells/µL, a CrAg detection rate of 2.1% was reported. The district CrAg detection rate for counts ≤ 200 cells/µL ranged from 1.4% (Central Karoo) to 5.9% (Cape Winelands). Excluding subdistricts without CrAg-positive specimens, the detection rate ranged from 1.3% (Beaufort West) to 8.3% (Swartland). Conclusion: The study findings of a CrAg detection rate of 4.0% in the Western Cape province justifies their decision to extend reflexed screening to a threshold of 200 cells/µL. However, most CrAg-positive specimens were identified for a count < 100 cells/µL. Intensified approaches to find CrAg-positive patients with a count ≤ 200 cells/µL are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.