ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Deep learning for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection: a review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-based Node-RADS for metastatic lymph node detection in colon cancer and influence of microsatellite instability.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Validation of MRI-based nnU-Net model for automated segmentation of neck lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Dynamic graph convolution with comprehensive pruning and GNN classification for precise lymph node metastasis detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation therapy remains a cornerstone in the treatment of cancer, with the delineation of Organs at Risk (OARs), tumors, and malignant lymph nodes playing a critical role in the planning process. However, the manual segmentation of these anatomical structures is both time-consuming and costly, with inter-observer and intra-observer variability often leading to delineation errors. In recent years, deep learning-based automatic segmentation has gained increasing attention, leading to a proliferation of scholarly works on OAR and tumor segmentation algorithms utilizing deep learning techniques. Nevertheless, similar comprehensive reviews focusing solely on malignant lymph nodes are scarce. This paper provides an in-depth review of the advancements in deep learning for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection. After a brief overview of deep learning methodologies, the review examines specific models and their outcomes for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection across five clinical sites: head and neck, upper extremity, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The discussion section extensively covers the current challenges and future trends in this field, analyzing how they might impact clinical applications. This review aims to bridge the gap in literature by providing a focused overview on deep learning applications in the context of malignant lymph node challenges, offering insights into their potential to enhance the precision and efficiency of cancer treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.