Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356883›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

An acoustic model of speech dysprosody in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Fredrik Nylén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fredrik NylénDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the acoustic properties most indicative of dysprosody severity in patients with Parkinson's disease using an automated acoustic assessment procedure. Method: A total of 108 read speech recordings of 68 speakers with PD (45 male, 23 female, aged 65.0 ± 9.8 yea Results: The acoustic predictors of importance spanned several acoustic domains of prosodic relevance, with the variability in Conclusion: Human expert raters' assessments of dysprosody can be approximated by the automated procedure, affording application in clinical settings where an experienced expert is unavailable. Variability in pitch does not adequately describe the level of dysprosody due to Parkinson's disease.

Indexed as

automatic acoustic assessmentdysarthriadysprosodyParkinson's diseaseprosody

Identifiers

PMID40356883
PMCPMC12066530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.