ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluating the equity of access to community health service centers in different regions of China based on cyclability and walkability.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With China's rapid urbanization and aging population, ensuring equitable access to essential facilities in Community Health Service Centers (CHSCs) is critical for delivering primary healthcare to older adults. These centers serve as the frontline for managing chronic diseases, promoting healthy aging, and reducing healthcare disparities among the older adults. This study investigates the equity of CHSCs across eastern, central, and western regions of China using indicators of cyclability and walkability, both of which are essential for older populations who often rely on active travel modes due to physical or economic limitations. A total of 110 nationally ranked CHSCs were selected for analysis. Geographic Information System (GIS) technology was used to assess cyclability, defined by a 1,000-meter residential area coverage, and walkability, represented by the average Walk Score. Results show that the cyclability scores for the eastern, central, and western regions were 0.71, 0.64, and 0.46, respectively, below the national standard of a 3,000-meter service radius, highlighting insufficient cycling access to primary care for older residents. Walkability scores were 0.351, 0.388, and 0.287, with lower values, particularly concerning aging populations with limited mobility. These findings reveal pronounced regional disparities and point to the need for spatial optimization of CHSCs, increased facility provision, and targeted resource allocation to western regions. By enhancing the active accessibility of community healthcare services, particularly for older adults, this research provides policy-relevant evidence to advance equity, promote healthy aging, and support sustainable public health planning in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.