Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356780›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Head circumference percentiles in Indian children with Down syndrome.

Harvinder Kaur, Anil Kumar Bhalla, Inusha Panigrahi, Rupinder Kaur, Neha Sudhera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harvinder KaurChild Growth & Anthropology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Anil Kumar BhallaChild Growth & Anthropology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Inusha PanigrahiGenetics & Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Rupinder KaurChild Growth & Anthropology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Neha SudheraChild Growth & Anthropology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to construct age- and sex-specific growth percentiles for head circumference (HC) that can be used as a reference for Indian children with Down syndrome (DS). Over 24 years, following a mixed-longitudinal growth research design, 2,327 head circumference measurements were performed on 1,125 (boys: 752, girls: 373) children with DS karyotypically proven as cases of free trisomy 21 who were aged <1 month to 10 years, following a standardized anthropometric technique. A steady increase in the mean head circumference of male and female children with DS was noted. Boys with DS had significantly larger HCs than girls. Our study showed that 12.9% of Down syndrome cases had normal head circumference, 27.2% had small heads, and the majority, 59.9%, had microcephaly. Head circumference percentiles for boys and girls with Down syndrome were constructed for ages <1 month to 10 years. There is a need to monitor the growth of children with Down syndrome using population-specific and specialized growth charts. The age- and sex-specific head circumference growth percentiles presented for Indian children with Down syndrome can be used for growth monitoring and inter-population comparison.

Indexed as

microcephalynorthwest Indiapercentilessmall headtrisomy 21

Identifiers

PMID40356780
PMCPMC12066698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.