ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Evaluation of task sharing as a workforce optimization strategy in pediatric oncology.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Task sharing is a pragmatic response to the growing shortage of pediatric oncologists globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there have been limited evaluations of how task sharing has been implemented. In this study, we sought to determine the roles and responsibilities of task-sharing physicians (TSPs) in one LMIC, Pakistan. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted across 16 hospitals with secondary- to quaternary-level pediatric oncology facilities. An online survey was used to determine task-sharing models, the responsibilities of TSPs, and the level of supervision. Pediatric oncologists were present at 13 of the 16 centers, with a median of 2 pediatric oncologists per center. We found that TSPs included tiers of medical officers/general physicians and pediatricians. They provided inpatient, outpatient, overnight and emergency room coverage. TSPs could participate in defining cancer diagnosis and risk-stratification (n = 9; 56%), selecting initial chemotherapy plans for patients with newly diagnosed cancer (n = 6; 38%) and modifying chemotherapy on the basis of toxicities (n = 6; 38%) under supervision of a pediatric oncologist. In addition, TSPs could write intravenous chemotherapy orders (n = 10; 63%) and prescribe oral chemotherapy (n = 10; 63%). Furthermore, they could independently perform procedures, such as lumbar punctures (n = 15; 94%), intrathecal chemotherapy administration (n = 11; 69%), and bone marrow aspirates and biopsies (n = 11; 69%). TSPs are critical in the pediatric oncology workforce with responsibilities across the pediatric cancer care continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.