Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Yiping Jin, Yi Wang, Lu Wang, He Zhang, Beibei Ren, Jiawen Zheng, Qingxin Xia, Yanyan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MedComm · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Correlation ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiping JinDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
He ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Beibei RenDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jiawen ZhengDepartment of Molecular pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qingxin XiaDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yanyan LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with TP53 mutations has specific clinicopathological features and is usually associated with a poor prognosis. TP53 gene mutations typically lead to aberrant expression patterns of the p53 protein. We studied 123 DLBCL patients at Henan Cancer Hospital, 35.8% (44/123) had TP53 mutations. Analysis of mutation sites in 44 cases of DLBCL patients revealed that the mutations primarily occur in the DNA-binding domain (DBD region) of the encoded p53 protein; among all mutation types, there were 8 truncation or frameshift mutations, and 36 missense mutations. Further, immunohistochemistry (IHC) detected expression levels of p53 protein in 123 DLBCL samples. The mutation results were used as a reference, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed. Ultimately, the expression ratio of 65% and the moderate-strong expression intensity were regarded as the cut-off value, namely high p53 expression or p53 negative (<1%) indicated mutant-type p53 protein. the complete remission (CR) rate of the mutant-type p53 protein group after receiving R-CHOP regimen was 50% (14/28), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 75%, which differed significantly (P<0.01) compared with wild-type p53 protein group [CR rate of 75.86% (66/87) and ORR rate of 89.66%]. Common gene mutations in the mutant-type p53 protein group primarily involve alterations in pathways related to epigenetics, B cell antigen receptor signaling, cell cycle, among others. IHC analysis of the p53 protein is a simple and low-cost approach that can be employed to predict TP53 mutation status and therapy response.

Indexed as

diffuse large B–cell lymphomaimmunohistochemistrynext–generation sequencingp53 proteinTP53 mutation

Identifiers

PMID40356758
PMCPMC12066628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.