ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Influencing factors of colonoscopy screening in first-degree relatives of hospitalized colorectal cancer patients and preliminary clinical practices to improve the compliance.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the factors that influence colonoscopy screening in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and explore the feasibility to invite FDRs to undergo a colonoscopy to improve screening compliance. Methods: Retrospective analysis based on a prospectively collected database of which FDRs of CRC patients who visited our center between April 2021 and October 2021 and received a questionnaire surgery. The questionnaire contained three aspects: demographic and lifestyle factors, health beliefs, and disease cognition. The FDRs were invited to undergo a colonoscopy and were followed-up by telephone regarding colonoscopy compliance one year later. Results: In total, 303 FDRs from 256 patients with CRC were analyzed. Among them, 113 underwent colonoscopy, with a colonoscopy compliance rate of 37.3%. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that the FDRs who underwent colonoscopy were older (OR=2.32, p=0.006), had commercial insurance (OR=2.23, p=0.013), had multiple family members with CRC (OR=3.04, p=0.012), had higher cognition of CRC (OR=3.02, p=0.006), had high self-efficacy for disease screening (OR=1.14, p=0.026), and accepted colonoscopy appointment sheet to undergo colonoscopy screening (OR=4.51, p<0.001), which were influencing factors for CRC screening in FDRs. Conclusion: This study found that FDRs who were ≥40 years old, had commercial insurance, had multiple family members with CRC, had higher cognition of CRC, had high self-efficacy for disease screening, and received a colonoscopy appointment while in the hospital were more willing to undergo colonoscopy screening. Studies could further validate the feasibility of this approach in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.