ReviewJournal of public health in Africa2025
Evidence from HIV sequencing for blood-borne transmission in Africa.
Review in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating historic and recent non-sexual HIV transmission to women in sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Bloodborne HIV infections in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence of clusters and response options.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: excessive focus on heterosexual vaginal intercourse.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The consensus view that heterosexual transmission dominates human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa survives side-by-side with surveys and studies reporting infections in children with HIV-negative mothers, in virgins, and in adolescents and adults who claim no possible sexual exposure to HIV. Aim: In this scoping review, we aim to show what phylogenetic analyses of HIV sequences say about the possible contribution of blood-borne transmission to HIV epidemics. Setting: The focus was on sub-Saharan Africa. Method: The authors conducted a search on PubMed and other platforms for studies reporting phylogenetic analyses of HIV in blood samples collected from at least 100 infected adults through community-based surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. They focussed on identifying information pertinent to assessing blood-borne transmission. Results: Sixteen reports met the search criteria and provided information to assess blood-borne transmission. In five studies, similar HIV sequences from (reported or assumed) household couples identified a likely heterosexual source for 0.3% - 7.5% of community adults with sequenced HIV. In 10 studies, a median of 43% of sequence pairs linked two people of the same sex. Two studies report clusters of recent infections too large to be easily explained by sexual transmission. Conclusion: Evidence from sequencing agrees with much other evidence that blood-borne HIV transmission is not rare in sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence also allows that blood-borne transmission could be making a major contribution to Africa's HIV epidemics. Contribution: Evidence of harm is sufficient to stimulate discussions about what more could be done to address this continuing problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.