Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356723›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025

Type-2 diabetes epigenetic biomarkers: present status and future directions for global and Indigenous health.

Sarah Munns, Alex Brown, Sam Buckberry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah MunnsThe Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Alex BrownThe Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sam BuckberryThe Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type-2 diabetes is a systemic condition with rising global prevalence, disproportionately affecting Indigenous communities worldwide. Recent advances in epigenomics methods, particularly in DNA methylation detection, have enabled the discovery of associations between epigenetic changes and Type-2 diabetes. In this review, we summarise DNA methylation profiling methods, and discuss how these technologies can facilitate the discovery of epigenomic biomarkers for Type-2 diabetes. We critically evaluate previous DNA methylation biomarker studies, particularly those using microarray platforms, and advocate for a shift towards sequencing-based approaches to improve genome-wide coverage. Furthermore, we emphasise the need for biomarker studies that include genetically diverse populations, especially Indigenous communities who are significantly impacted by Type-2 diabetes. We discuss research approaches and ethical considerations that can better facilitate Type-2 diabetes biomarker development to ensure that future genomics-based precision medicine efforts deliver equitable health outcomes. We propose that by addressing these gaps, future research can better capture the genetic and environmental complexities of Type-2 diabetes among populations at disproportionate levels of risk, ultimately leading to more effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

biomarkerscardiometabolic diseaseDNA methylationepigenetic clockIndigenous data sovereigntyIndigenous healthtype-2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40356723
PMCPMC12066322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.