ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Learning from the Kenyan experiment: key takeaways for implementing managed equipment services in developing countries.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the "idling dilemma" of donated medical equipment: a TDABC-based analysis of health policy failure and a pathway to reform.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Challenges of healthcare quality in Kenya's tertiary hospitals: assessing the contribution and constraints of asset leasing financing mechanism.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2015, the Kenyan government signed 7-year contracts with 5 Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to improve healthcare accessibility and equity. The OEMs were to supply, install, maintain, and replace equipment and provide user training for 98 hospitals across Kenya's 47 counties through a Managed Equipment Services (MES) arrangement. This paper highlights the planning, procurement, and implementation of Kenya's first comprehensive MES arrangement. Methods: Retrospective review of the implementation process drawing data from program databases, reports, and other relevant sources. Results: The MES program was successfully implemented in Kenya for the first time to upscale specialised health infrastructure and expand critical healthcare services across the 47 counties. Previously unavailable services in the county's hospitals, such as dialysis, were set up in 49 hospitals, critical care units in 11 hospitals, and theatre, sterilisation, and imaging services were expanded in 98 hospitals. The program provided reliable equipment installation and maintenance, increased healthcare workers' capacity through training, and created a more conducive working environment. Key lessons learned include importance of defining detailed equipment specifications, ensuring comprehensive stakeholder engagement, and allowing sufficient time for assessment and implementation. Challenges encountered were prolonged procurement process, insufficient stakeholder buy-in, and delays in implementation. Conclusions: We have described our experience of planning, procurement, and implementation processes and the lessons learned from a large and comprehensive MES project in Kenya. The MES process is intricate and time-consuming, requiring a team of skilled professionals. Prior to beginning the MES design, a well-planned hospital assessment can alleviate potential obstacles. Despite financial limitations, MES arrangement has the potential to enhance significantly healthcare services, particularly in low- and middle-income nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.