Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356709›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Learning from the Kenyan experiment: key takeaways for implementing managed equipment services in developing countries.

Ephantus Njagi, Keneth Iloka, Sasha Wawira, Laban Thiga, Nicholas Muraguri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ephantus NjagiDepartment of Human Pathology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Keneth IlokaSchool of Engineering and Technology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sasha WawiraAdam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Laban ThigaMinistry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nicholas MuraguriMinistry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2015, the Kenyan government signed 7-year contracts with 5 Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to improve healthcare accessibility and equity. The OEMs were to supply, install, maintain, and replace equipment and provide user training for 98 hospitals across Kenya's 47 counties through a Managed Equipment Services (MES) arrangement. This paper highlights the planning, procurement, and implementation of Kenya's first comprehensive MES arrangement. Methods: Retrospective review of the implementation process drawing data from program databases, reports, and other relevant sources. Results: The MES program was successfully implemented in Kenya for the first time to upscale specialised health infrastructure and expand critical healthcare services across the 47 counties. Previously unavailable services in the county's hospitals, such as dialysis, were set up in 49 hospitals, critical care units in 11 hospitals, and theatre, sterilisation, and imaging services were expanded in 98 hospitals. The program provided reliable equipment installation and maintenance, increased healthcare workers' capacity through training, and created a more conducive working environment. Key lessons learned include importance of defining detailed equipment specifications, ensuring comprehensive stakeholder engagement, and allowing sufficient time for assessment and implementation. Challenges encountered were prolonged procurement process, insufficient stakeholder buy-in, and delays in implementation. Conclusions: We have described our experience of planning, procurement, and implementation processes and the lessons learned from a large and comprehensive MES project in Kenya. The MES process is intricate and time-consuming, requiring a team of skilled professionals. Prior to beginning the MES design, a well-planned hospital assessment can alleviate potential obstacles. Despite financial limitations, MES arrangement has the potential to enhance significantly healthcare services, particularly in low- and middle-income nations.

Indexed as

healthcare systemmanaged equipment services (MES)public-private partnership (PPP)public procurementuniversal health coverage (UHC)

Identifiers

PMID40356709
PMCPMC12066563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.