Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356667›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Close neighbors, not intruders: investigating the role of tank bromeliads in shaping faunal microbiomes.

Rodolfo Martínez-Mota, Antonio Acini Vásquez-Aguilar, Dolores Hernández-Rodríguez, Emilio A Suárez-Domínguez, Thorsten Krömer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rodolfo Martínez-MotaCentro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Antonio Acini Vásquez-AguilarRed de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. (INECOL), Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Dolores Hernández-RodríguezInstituto de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Emilio A Suárez-DomínguezFacultad de Biología and Museo de Zoología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Thorsten KrömerCentro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-8172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tropical montane cloud forests contain high levels of epiphyte diversity. Epiphytic tank bromeliads play an important role in the functioning of these ecosystems and provide a microhabitat for many species of invertebrates. Microbial ecology theory suggests that the environment serves as a source of microbes for animals, but the contribution of this factor to the composition of an animal microbiome varies. In this study, we examined the extent to which tank bromeliads ( Methods: We used 16S rRNA sequencing to characterize the bacterial communities in the organic matter within bromeliad tanks and in the whole bodies (surface and gut) of larvae from two fly taxa ( Results: The bacterial communities in bromeliad tanks were primarily composed of Pseudomonadota, Acidobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Spirochaetota. Similarly, communities of the fly larvae contained Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Bacillota, and Actinomycetota. Bromeliad tanks exhibited the highest bacterial richness, followed by Conclusions: Our data suggest that the microbiome of flies, which inhabit tank bromeliads during their larval stage, is nourished to some extent by the bacterial communities present in the organic matter within the tank.

Indexed as

BacteriaBromeliaceaeDipteraMicrobiotaAnimalsEcosystemLarvaMexicoRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDipteraEpiphytesMexicoMicrobial transferMicrobiomeMicrohabitatsTillandsiaTropical cloud forest

Identifiers

PMID40356667
PMCPMC12068248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.