ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Repeatability, reliability, and stability of eye movement measurements in Parkinson's disease, cerebellar ataxia, and healthy adults.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-tracking biomarkers for glaucoma based on saccadic reaction time: a controlled clinical study.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Pupil-light reflex in early-stage Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Technical validation of a virtual reality-based eye tracker for neuro-ophthalmic assessment: a reliability and reproducibility study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Visual attention during non-immersive virtual reality balance training in older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairment: an eye-tracking study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamic Pupillary Responses in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Controlled Clinical Study Using High-Frequency Video-Oculography.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eye movements have been proposed as biomarkers to track disease progression and treatment effects in neurological diseases. Before such variables are used in the clinic or in drug trials, properties such as measurement error must be documented. In this study, we assessed repeatability, reliability, and stability of fixation, smooth pursuit, and saccade measurements in patients with Parkinson's disease, cerebellar ataxia, and healthy adults. Methods: Fixation, smooth pursuit, and saccade metrics were measured in 16 patients with Parkinson's disease, 16 patients with ataxia, and 25 healthy adults with an eye tracker (BulbiCam). The same operator repeated the measurements six times over 2 days in the patient group and two times the same day in the healthy adults. Reliability, repeatability, and stability were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots with the Agreement Index, and the Stability Index, respectively. Results: Mean pupil size in the fixation test and latency, accuracy and peak velocity in the pro-saccade test were found reliable, repeatable, and stable. Mean and max fixation in the fixation test were found reliable and stable. Smooth pursuit measurements were found repeatable within patients and stable, but not reliable. Conclusion: The saccade and pupil variables may be used both on a population level and for individual patient follow-up. Mean and max fixation duration may be used on the population level but used in the clinical evaluation on individual patients they need to be repeated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.