Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Task demands influence search strategy selection in otoconia-deficient mice.

Ryan M Yoder, Lucas C Carstensen, Keshav Jagannathan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan M YoderDepartment of Psychology, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.
Lucas C CarstensenDepartment of Psychology, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.
Keshav JagannathanDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, United States.

Funding

Otolith-Dependent Cognition in MiceR15DC012630 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI YODER, RYAN MATTHEW · 2012 to 2015
$797k
NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC012630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The vestibular system plays a crucial role in visual and non-visual navigation. Our recent study found that signals from the otolith organs are necessary for mice's use of distal visual cues to guide navigation to an invisible goal. Somewhat surprisingly, however, performance was not significantly impaired on some spatial tasks (e.g., Barnes maze reference memory task), questioning the role of otolith signals in visual navigation. Methods: We report the results of several additional tests of reference memory performance and search strategy use on two versions of the Barnes maze, in an attempt to establish further understanding of the otolithic contribution to visual navigation. Results: On a small Barnes maze, control mice preferentially used the efficient "spatial" search strategy by the last (8th) day of training, whereas otoconia-deficient Discussion: Overall, these results suggest that otolith dysfunction in mice is associated with subtle navigational deficits that became apparent on the small maze but that were less apparent on the large maze. It is possible that these navigational differences resulted from the greater distance between start and goal locations of the large maze, relative to the small maze. Alternatively, the large maze's greater distance between the goal and potential alternatives may have facilitated more accurate place recognition.

Indexed as

Barnes mazeotolith organsreference memoryself-movementspatial

Identifiers

PMID40356633
PMCPMC12066313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.