SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
The prognostic value of homocysteine levels in hemorrhagic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Apolipoprotein B100 and white matter hyperintensity as distinct mediators of thrombolytic response in acute stroke: preliminary findings.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemorrhagic stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, prompting the search for modifiable risk factors and prognostic indicators. Elevated homocysteine levels have been implicated in vascular diseases, but their link to hemorrhagic stroke outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between homocysteine levels and outcomes in hemorrhagic stroke patients. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for studies comparing the outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke in patients with high versus normal homocysteine levels. Data were pooled using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for mortality and poor functional outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for homocysteine levels, with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The review included 10 studies. Pooled analysis showed no significant association between high homocysteine levels and increased risk of mortality (OR: 1.123, 95% CI: 0.589 to 2.143), poor functional outcomes (OR: 1.203, 95% CI: 0.962 to 1.504), or unfavorable neurological outcomes (OR: 1.001, 95% CI: 0.618 to 1.620). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among studies. Conclusion: High homocysteine levels were not significantly associated with mortality, functional outcomes, or unfavorable neurological outcomes in hemorrhagic stroke patients. The clinical utility of homocysteine as a prognostic marker in this population remains uncertain and warrants further research. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42024527207.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.