ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Moving to greener neighborhoods and healthcare costs in Northern California.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Environmental drivers of healthcare costs are mainly unknown. Studies that account for changes in longitudinal, within-individual changes accompanying changes in residential addresses have not been conducted. In the current study, we tested whether moving to a greener neighborhood was associated with decreases in healthcare costs and whether these associations vary by individual and neighborhood-level characteristics. Methods: Cohort study with 13-year administrative data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who moved (N = 129,576) and did not move (N = 4,807,135). Healthcare costs and neighborhood characteristics before and after residential moves were examined, considering age, sex, race, neighborhood socioeconomic status, air pollution, and population density. Change in neighborhood greenery was measured as changes in deciles of satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in 250-m, 500-m, and 1000-m Euclidean buffers. Nonmovers were retained for analyses as they represented individuals with no changes in neighborhood greenery. Results: We found that moving to greener neighborhoods was generally not associated with changes in healthcare costs. However, moving to greener areas was associated with decreases in outpatient costs (NDVI-250-m relative cost ratio [RCR] = 0.993, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.987, 0.999). Movers with the greatest increase in greenness had $89 less annual outpatient costs than movers who maintained their greenness levels. Subgroup analyses found significant decreases in outpatient costs for women (RCR = 0.992, CI = 0.985,0.999), adults aged 18-44 (RCR = 0.989, CI = 0.981,0.996), and individuals moving from lower population density-neighborhoods (RCR = 0.991, CI = 0.983,0.999). Conclusions: This longitudinal, within-individual analysis found little evidence to support the hypothesis that moving to greener neighborhoods is associated with reduced healthcare spending. Future studies should incorporate data on duration of residence, individual socioeconomic status, reasons for moving, and broader economic outcomes to better evaluate how residential environments may influence healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.