ArticleBJUI compass2025
PSMA PET/CT findings in high-risk biochemical recurrence after local treatment of prostate cancer.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testosterone-Sparing Treatment Strategies for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- PSMA PET/CT findings in high-risk biochemical recurrence after local treatment of prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To describe PSMA PET/CT characteristics of patients with high-risk BCR. Subjects/patients and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk BCR prostate cancer (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml above nadir after radiation therapy [RT] or ≥1 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy [RP] +/- RT) who underwent PET/CT from July 2021-March 2023. Patients with prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiated >3 months prior to PET/CT or positive conventional imaging within 3 months of PET/CT were excluded. Neoadjuvant/adjuvant ADT completed ≥9 months prior was allowed. Logistic regression, Pearson's Chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis. Results: A total of 113 of 145 (77%) included patients in the analysis had ≥1 lesion on PSMA PET/CT. There was no difference in PSMA PET/CT positivity based on age, race, Gleason Grade at initial biopsy or PSA. Overall, 29 (20%) patients had lesions in the prostate/prostate bed only, 31 (21%) had lesions consistent with N1M0 disease and 53 (37%) had lesions consistent with M1 disease. For M1 patients, 21/53 (40%) had oligometastatic disease (1-3 lesions), and 32/53 (60%) had a higher burden (>3 lesions). Local recurrence was more common with RT and nodal recurrence with RP, with no difference in distant metastasis by initial treatment. Conclusion: Nearly 80% of patients with high-risk BCR after local treatment for prostate cancer with RP and/or RT will have positive findings on PSMA PET/CT. In addition to intensified systemic therapy, up to 55% of the patients may have benefitted from salvage local therapy, nodal pelvic radiation or metastasis-directed therapies for oligometastatic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.