ReviewJournal of intensive care medicine2026
Developmental Care in the Early Years in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients as a Strategy to Mitigate Pediatric Post-Intensive-Care Syndrome: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Executive Functioning in Kindergarten-Aged Children After Complex Cardiac Surgery in Early Infancy.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Comparison of a Cardiac Specific Versus a General Instrument to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life 4-5 Years After Cardiac Surgery in Early Infancy.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes for pediatric ventricular assist device and heart transplant patients in the modern Era.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Chronic phase ventilation strategy in established severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A critical evaluation of the evidence.SAGE open medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survivors after pediatric critical care often have adverse sequelae in domains of cognition, executive function, attention, memory, visual-spatial skills, language, motor function, behavior, and emotional functioning, the post-intensive-care syndrome pediatric (PICS-p). The time from birth to approximately age 2 years is a period of rapid structural and functional brain development. The fundamental structural and functional architecture of the brain is in place by the second year of life. This narrative review focuses on how we, in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), can work towards maximizing each patient's full potential despite adverse experiences during hospitalization. In part I, concepts relevant to understanding the effects of hospitalization in PICU on brain development are clarified, including concepts of toxic stress and trauma, sensitive periods and cascades, experience-expectant neural plasticity in the early years, and resilience and buffering of adversity focused on relational care. In part II, evidence is presented that these concepts are important because they describe the effects of early childhood adversity that are pervasive on physical health, cognitive, and emotional outcomes throughout the lifespan. Evidence is presented to show that intervention to improve these outcomes can be effective. In part III, the concepts and evidence are synthesized by focusing on the opportunity before us, what we must and can do better while patients are in the PICU, in order to improve their long-term lifelong outcomes. We present evidence to argue that we in pediatric critical care must take a public-health approach to address the key environmental conditions necessary for optimal early childhood development and hence facilitate children's ability to thrive. Future research must aim to determine what works best and what does not work in the PICU. Early childhood investments to improve lifelong outcomes have great potential to help patients and reduce the growing burden of healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.