ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Machine Learning-Based Identification of Children With Intermittent Exotropia Using Multiple Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mean Apparent Propagator MRI: A Potential Imaging Biomarker of Brain Microstructural Alterations in Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the performance of machine learning (ML) methods based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) parameters in distinguishing children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) from healthy controls (HCs).
methodForty-one IXT children and 36 HCs were recruited. The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF) in the slow-4 and slow-5 bands, and regional homogeneity (ReHo) were calculated. The 360 cortical areas of the Human Connectome Project multimodal parcellation atlas (HCP-MMP 1.0 atlas) were chosen as 360 regions of interest (ROIs). Each rs-fMRI parameter value of one ROI was taken as a feature. The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was performed to reduce dimensions. We used four feature selection methods and nine classifiers. The ten-fold cross-validation was applied to evaluate the results.
resultsThe ML methods combined with rs-fMRI parameters had good classification performance in distinguishing IXT children from HCs, with the slow-5 fALFF parameter showing the best classification performance. The linear regression (LR) classifier with analysis of variance (ANOVA) feature selection achieved the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curve values (0.957, 0.804, and 0.818 for the training, validation, and test datasets, respectively) using five features, including the slow-5 fALFF values of the right inferior parietal gyrus (IPG), right supplementary motor area (SMA), left primary somatosensory complex, right frontal opercula, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were 0.759, 0.759, and 0.760, respectively. The brain regions showing the greatest discriminative power included right IPG, right SMA, left primary somatosensory complex, right frontal opercula, left DLPFC, right posterior orbitofrontal cortex (pOFC), left medial superior temporal (MST), left parieto-occipital sulcus (POS), and right anterior ventral insula.
conclusionBased on the slow-5 fALFF values of the five cortices as the features, LR with ANOVA was the best ML model for distinguishing between IXT children and HCs. The result indicates the slow-5 fALFF parameter has the potential to serve as a biomarker for distinguishing IXT children from HCs. In addition, brain regions related to stereopsis, eye movement, and higher-order cognitive functions play an important role in the neuropathologic mechanisms underlying IXT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.