ArticleMacromolecular rapid communications2025
Electrospun Polybutylene Succinate Coatings for Sustainable Cardboard Packaging: Structure-Property Relationships.
Article in Macromolecular rapid communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrospun Polybutylene Succinate Coatings for Sustainable Cardboard Packaging: Structure-Property Relationships.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Producing thin biopolymer-coated paper and cardboard is essential for a large range of applications, such as food packaging, as it allows to maintain flexibility while reducing the environmental impact and enhancing barrier properties. This study investigates electrospinning to generate polybutylene succinate (PBS)-coated cardboards with contrasted structures (i.e., different thicknesses of the individual layers). Four contrasted structures of PBS-coated cardboards are produced, presenting low polymer thickness remaining on top of the substrate (10 to 25 µm) but differing in the thickness of their characteristic layers (including the impregnated layer). The effect of the electrospinning parameters (deposition time, method (direct vs indirect)) and annealing parameters on polymer-coated cardboards' structures are investigated. The annealing pressure only reduced the coated cardboard thickness, while the electrospinning method influenced the overall structure by affecting both the thickness of the impregnated layer and of the remaining layer of cardboard. The mechanical properties tested by tensile test are maintained or enhanced after coating while oxygen barrier properties are largely enhanced for some samples. Decreasing the impregnated layer thickness resulted in a Young's modulus increase (+3 to +23%) and a decrease in stress at break (-40 to -70%), highlighting the impact of polymer-coated cardboards's structures on their mechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.