Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356305›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025

Kinetic Analysis of the Redox-Neutral Catalytic Mitsunobu Reaction: Dehydration, Kinetic Barriers, and Hopping between Potential Energy Surfaces.

Keith G Andrews, Stefan Borsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keith G AndrewsDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Lower Mount Joy, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-0246
Stefan BorsleyDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Lower Mount Joy, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denton's redox-neutral catalytic Mitsunobu reaction is remarkable in that it translates a reaction traditionally driven by the consumption of sacrificial chemical reagents to an additive-free catalytic manifold. Rational attempts to improve the system have been met with only marginal improvements, and a lack of consensus concerning the rate-determining step continues to limit effective reaction development. Here, we analyze the reaction mechanism focusing on a critical, largely overlooked element: the removal of water using a Dean-Stark apparatus. Experimental analysis of the water removal process, coupled with extensive kinetic simulations, demonstrates that the overall rate of the reaction is intimately tied to the rate of water removal. This process can be viewed as a transition between potential energy surfaces and, consequently, subsequent steps of the reaction can progress spontaneously in the absence of water, allowing an explanation of how Le Chatelier's principle, a thermodynamic effect, can have a profound kinetic influence over the rate of the reaction. We identify three bottlenecks in the reaction that inform catalyst design. Additionally, we (a) clarify the ongoing discussion regarding the rate-determining step, (b) provide clear advice concerning future reaction design taking into account the role of water and, (c) discuss the redox-neutral catalytic Mitsunobu reaction in the context of formally endergonic esterification reactions, noting parallels with ratchet mechanisms. Finally, we highlight general principles of catalyst/reaction design that emerge from our analysis and implement our findings to demonstrate a 50% rate acceleration resulting from improved water removal, a substantially greater reaction enhancement than previously obtained from computationally guided catalyst structural changes.

Identifiers

PMID40356305
PMCPMC12123607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.