SynthesisBrain and behavior2025
Does the Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Improve Clinical Outcomes in Adults With Autoimmune Encephalitis? A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunological Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Emerging Therapies.Biology · 2025Review
- Natural autoantibodies and their functional therapeutic roles in intravenous immunoglobulin.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutoimmune encephalitis is an immune-mediated inflammatory condition affecting the central nervous system. Current best-practice guidelines recommend intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for use if corticosteroids are ineffective, but the evidence surrounding the efficacy of IVIG in autoimmune encephalitis is yet to be evaluated.
objectivesPerform a systematic review of the available literature to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG in autoimmune encephalitis and the impact of IVIG on clinical outcomes.
methodsThis systematic review was written following PRISMA-S guidelines. Papers eligible for inclusion were primary research including adults aged 16 years and above, with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis, treated using IVIG. Each included study was assessed for quality. RESULTS AND
conclusionFrom 2533 records, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. The use of IVIG is associated with improved short-term and long-term neurological outcomes. There is evidence that IVIG may be more effective when used in combination with corticosteroids. The use of IVIG is significantly associated with reduced seizure incidence in patients. Where recorded, adverse effects related to IVIG were few. There is insufficient data available on how IVIG impacts mortality rates, discharge rates, and its effects according to different types of autoimmune encephalitis. Out of the included papers, there was 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 3 nonrandomized trials and 23 cohort studies. 25 of 27 papers were deemed to have a high or serious risk of bias. Heterogeneous study design and the quality of studies were major limiting factors for this review, highlighting the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.