Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40356292›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

National-scale mapping of potential floral resources for honeybees and native pollinators in New Zealand.

James K McCarthy, Sarah J Richardson, Gary J Houliston, Thomas R Etherington, Matt S McGlone, Anne-Gaelle E Ausseil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. National-scale mapping of potential floral resources for honeybees and native pollinators in New Zealand.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James K McCarthyManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-1678
Sarah J RichardsonManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-0381
Gary J HoulistonManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-993X
Thomas R EtheringtonManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-075X
Matt S McGloneManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8130-5724
Anne-Gaelle E AusseilManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Wellington Central, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8923-0774

Funding

Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment C09X1608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floral resources are important food resources for pollinators. These resources are produced in different quantities depending on land cover and plant species composition, and the quantity of production varies seasonally. As such, land use change and management of natural resources can have substantial impacts on conservation through resource provision for pollinators, and also commercial enterprises through resources for honeybee hives which require adequate forage to be successful. In New Zealand, locations with vegetation that produce high-value honey also suffer from overcrowding of hives, as beekeepers compete for this valuable resource. At present, there is a lack of quantitative spatial data describing the production of these resources, especially over large spatial scales. Here, using maps of land cover and environment, and a large vegetation plot dataset, we show that the provision of floral resources for pollinators can be estimated spatially at national scales. These maps can be used to estimate the consequences of changing land cover, both historical and with future management actions, and to understand potential threats to floral resource provision. We find that the production of floral resources across New Zealand is highly seasonal, and overwhelmingly produced by indigenous land cover types, especially within public conservation land. Within forests, we show that floral production is dominated by a small number of plant families. Our results show the importance of native land cover for the provision of floral resources for commercial honeybee enterprises and also native pollinators. We anticipate our results will be a starting point to inform management decisions regarding the placement and stocking density of honeybee hives, and also the concession process for honeybee permits on public land. We also show how the restoration of woody ecosystems on cleared land can benefit the conservation of native pollinators by providing abundant and high-quality forage across all seasons.

Indexed as

FlowersPollinationAnimalsBeesConservation of Natural ResourcesNew ZealandapicultureApis melliferaflowering phenologyhoneydewhoney productionmānuka honeynational scalenectar productionpollen productionpollinationseasonalityspatial variation

Identifiers

PMID40356292
PMCPMC12070026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.