ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025
Evaluation of In-person versus Remote Cognitive Assessment in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults via Regression-Based Change Analysis.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-site video-based assessment with the NACC UDS-Version 3 battery: Design and participant experience in the V-Cog study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCompare the changes in neuropsychological test scores between remote and in-person follow-up assessment over a 1-year period using standardized regression-based (SRB) change indices.
methodParticipants were from the Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC; N = 230) [mean age: 68.6 (7.8) years; education: 16.3 (2.3) years; 71% female; 86% White] and cognitively normal (as defined by a CDR of 0) at baseline and follow-up [mean days: 420.03 (48.53)]. Follow-up testing with the Uniform Data Set v3 Cognitive Battery was completed in person (n = 121) or remotely (n = 109) via phone (n = 61) or video (n = 48). SRB change scores were calculated using published formulas. Chi-square analysis compared the frequency of scores falling outside of an SRB cut-point +/-1.645 for follow-up assessments and mean SRB change scores were compared.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the frequency of SRB change scores for in-person versus remote follow-up assessments at the SRB cut-point. Similarly, one-way ANOVAs comparing mean SRB change scores revealed no significant differences between in-person, telephone, and video follow-up means for any of the tests.
conclusionsTelephone and video cognitive assessments performed similarly to in-person assessment and offer a valuable tool for research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.