ArticleAnimal microbiome2025
Temporal microbial colonization on different forages is driven by the rumen environmental conditions.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host Filtering Shapes the Soil-gut Microbiome Linkages in Pastoral Systems.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- RNA-Seq Analysis of Ruminal Methane Emissions in Beef-on-Dairy Cattle: Evidence for Immune, Nervous, and Endocrine Pathway Involvement.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Lyophilized rumen fluid from goats fed different roughage-based diets: fermentation characteristics, microbial communities, and post-reconstitutionFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Characterising gut microbiome dysbiosis in diarrhoea calves from multiple farms in Inner Mongolia using 16S and metagenomics.Microbiome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rumen is one of the four compartments of the ruminant stomach and houses a diverse array of anaerobic microbes that play a crucial role in feed digestion and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production. The aim of this study was to explore how two different in vivo rumen environmental conditions, AHR (created from sheep-fed alfalfa hay) and CSR (created from sheep-fed corn stover), affect fiber digestion and rumen bacterial colonization in relation to two types of forage, alfalfa hay (AH) and corn stover (CS). Both AH and CS forages were subjected to in-sacco incubation in AHR and CSR conditions for a period of 48 h. The results revealed that CSR exhibited a less variant pH, lower total VFA concentration, and higher acetate-to-propionate ratio than AHR. CSR significantly enhanced the degradation of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in both incubated forages (AH and CS). Although CSR did not improve the degradation of dry matter (DM) or crude protein (CP) on AH, it improved the degradation of DM and CP on CS. Both CS and AH incubated under CSR were found to have a greater abundance of fibrolytic bacteria (e.g., Fibrobacter and Butyrivibrio 2) compared to the same forage incubated under AHR, especially during the initial stages of incubation. However, CS and AH incubated under AHR were colonized by bacteria specialized in breaking down soluble carbohydrates (e.g., Prevotella and Succinivibrio). Compared with AHR, CSR enhanced the degradation rates of both incubated forages (CS and AH). These findings underscore the role of the rumen microenvironment in affecting the composition of adherent microbial communities and enhancing the breakdown of forages. Therefore, optimizing the rumen microenvironment to promote the attachment of fibrolytic bacteria during the early fermentation stages while minimizing hydrogen accumulation to stabilize the pH could lead to improved forage fermentation and animal performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.