Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355960›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Temporal microbial colonization on different forages is driven by the rumen environmental conditions.

X Xie, J K Wang, J X Liu, L L Guan, A L A Neves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

X XieSchool of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, 315832, Ningbo, People's Republic of China.
J K WangInstitute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
J X LiuInstitute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
L L GuanDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada. lguan@ualberta.ca.
A L A NevesDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. andre.neves@sund.ku.dk.

Funding

General Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Education Department Y202352949National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20231Ningbo University Research Initial Fund for Excellent PhDs 422007422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rumen is one of the four compartments of the ruminant stomach and houses a diverse array of anaerobic microbes that play a crucial role in feed digestion and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production. The aim of this study was to explore how two different in vivo rumen environmental conditions, AHR (created from sheep-fed alfalfa hay) and CSR (created from sheep-fed corn stover), affect fiber digestion and rumen bacterial colonization in relation to two types of forage, alfalfa hay (AH) and corn stover (CS). Both AH and CS forages were subjected to in-sacco incubation in AHR and CSR conditions for a period of 48 h. The results revealed that CSR exhibited a less variant pH, lower total VFA concentration, and higher acetate-to-propionate ratio than AHR. CSR significantly enhanced the degradation of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in both incubated forages (AH and CS). Although CSR did not improve the degradation of dry matter (DM) or crude protein (CP) on AH, it improved the degradation of DM and CP on CS. Both CS and AH incubated under CSR were found to have a greater abundance of fibrolytic bacteria (e.g., Fibrobacter and Butyrivibrio 2) compared to the same forage incubated under AHR, especially during the initial stages of incubation. However, CS and AH incubated under AHR were colonized by bacteria specialized in breaking down soluble carbohydrates (e.g., Prevotella and Succinivibrio). Compared with AHR, CSR enhanced the degradation rates of both incubated forages (CS and AH). These findings underscore the role of the rumen microenvironment in affecting the composition of adherent microbial communities and enhancing the breakdown of forages. Therefore, optimizing the rumen microenvironment to promote the attachment of fibrolytic bacteria during the early fermentation stages while minimizing hydrogen accumulation to stabilize the pH could lead to improved forage fermentation and animal performance.

Indexed as

Forage degradationMicrobial successionRumen environmentRumen microbiota

Identifiers

PMID40355960
PMCPMC12067915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.