Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355959›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

Effect of newborn genomic screening for lysosomal storage disorders: a cohort study in China.

Xin Wang, Yun Sun, Xian-Wei Guan, Yan-Yun Wang, Dong-Yang Hong, Zhi-Lei Zhang, Ya-Hong Li, Pei-Ying Yang, Tao Jiang, Zheng-Feng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Progress and Prospects of Newborn Screening in China.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xin Wang *Genetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Yun Sun *Genetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Xian-Wei GuanGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Yan-Yun WangGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Dong-Yang HongGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Zhi-Lei ZhangGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Ya-Hong LiGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Pei-Ying YangGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China.
Tao JiangGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China. jiangtao6310@126.com.
Zheng-Feng XuGenetic Medicine Center, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuai District, 123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210004, China. Zhengfeng_xu_nj@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 32100680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) have a relatively high incidence among rare diseases and can lead to severe consequences if not treated promptly. However, many countries and regions have not included these disorders in their newborn screening programs, resulting in missed early detection, underdiagnosis, and delayed treatment. Newborn genomic screening (NBGS) has shown good screening effectiveness for traditional biochemical screening diseases; however, its effectiveness for LSDs has not yet been evaluated in the general newborn population.

methodsTo evaluate the outcome of NBGS for LSDs, a cohort study was conducted involving newborns recruited from Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital in China from March 18, 2022, to September 21, 2023. All participants underwent NBGS of 15 LSDs (18 genes) via dried blood spots, followed by enzyme activity testing for NBGS-positive individuals. The study calculated the incidence and carrier rates for each LSD though NBGS, as well as the positive screening rate, the false positive rate and the positive predictive value of the screening process.

resultsAmong 22,687 newborns (11,996 males [52.88%]), 1344 (6.0%) were identified as carriers, and 30 (0.13%) were initially positive for LSDs. Of these, 4 were excluded, 15 were diagnosed as LSD-presymptomatic individuals based on enzyme deficiency and pathogenic variants conforming to inheritance patterns, and 11 remain under follow-up. The estimated combined birth incidence of LSDs in Nanjing was 1/1512, primarily including Fabry disease, Krabbe disease, glycogen storage disease type II, Niemann-Pick disease, and mucopolysaccharidosis type II. Rather than directly comparing NBGS and enzyme activity screening, this study evaluated two sequential screening strategies: (1) NBGS-first with reflex enzyme testing and (2) enzyme activity-first with reflex genomic testing. The NBGS-first strategy demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity, with a significantly lower false positive rate and higher positive predictive values compared to the enzyme-first strategy (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of NBGS to enhance early detection of presymptomatic LSD individuals, enabling timely interventions and improving newborn health outcomes. Integrating NBGS into routine newborn screening programs could provide an effective and proactive approach for LSD identification and management.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingLysosomal Storage DiseasesNeonatal ScreeningChinaCohort StudiesFemaleGenomicsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleLysosomal storage disorderNewborn genomic screeningNewborn screeningRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID40355959
PMCPMC12070756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.