ArticleHuman genomics2025
Prognostic significance of clonal hematopoiesis in STEMI: a 10-year follow-up reveals high-risk gene mutations.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging Prognostic Risk Factors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Beyond Traditional Risk Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo elucidate the extent and clinical implications of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) prevalence in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to evaluate its utility as a contributory factor for risk stratification in long-term outcomes.
methodsWhole-exome sequencing was performed in a cohort of 101 patients presenting with STEMI who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients were longitudinally followed for over 120 months. Their genomic data were compared with those from a control group of 706 individuals without cardiovascular events. Comparative analyses were conducted to identify patterns of CHIP between the STEMI and control cohorts.
resultsIn our cohort, 37.6% (n = 38) of STEMI patients exhibited somatic mutations associated with CHIP at a variant allele frequency of 1% or greater, compared to 22.8% (n = 161) in the control group. The most frequently detected mutations in STEMI patients were in the ASXL1 and CREBBP genes, each present in 5.0% of this cohort. Long-term follow-up revealed that STEMI patients with CHIP had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-4.28, p = 0.015).
conclusionCHIP is prevalent in the STEMI patient cohort and is significantly correlated with adverse clinical outcomes. Incorporating CHIP status could enhance the risk stratification process, thus informing more tailored clinical management strategies for STEMI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.