ArticleBMC nursing2025
The current situation and associated factors of the psychological capital of nurses' second victims in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe level of psychological capital of nurses' second victims is critical to alleviate their negative experience after a safety incident. The purpose of this study is to understand the current status of psychological capital and associated factors of nurses after experiencing patient safety incidents.
methodsIn May 2024, an online survey was conducted on nurses from 2 tertiary hospitals and 2 secondary hospitals in Shanxi Province who had experienced patient safety incidents in the past year using the General Information Questionnaire, the Patient Safety Incident Characteristics Questionnaire, and the Nurses' Psychological Capital Questionnaire, and finally 456 nurses filled out the questionnaire.
resultsA total of 423 valid questionnaires were collected, and the recovery rate of valid questionnaires was 92.76%. The total score of psychological capital of the nurses' second victims was (89.13 ± 14.86), and the results of multiple linear regression showed that hospital level, department, the type of patient safety incident, the level of patient safety incident, and whether or not they were supported were independent associated factors of the psychological capital of the second victims (P < 0.05), which could explain 21.00% of the total variation.
conclusionThe psychological capital of the nurses' second victims was at a medium level. At the hospital level, the focus should be on nurses in tertiary hospitals. At the department level, the focus should be on the nurses in the oncology department. From the level of patient safety incidents, we should focus on the nurses with high event level and drug administration errors, and provide timely intervention support after the incident, so as to improve the psychological capital level of the second victims. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.