ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Insights into healthcare workers' perceptions of electronic medical record system utilization: a cross-sectional study in Mafeteng district, Lesotho.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic medical record (EMR) systems have significantly transformed how healthcare data is created, managed, and utilized, offering improved legibility, accessibility, and support for clinical decision-making compared to paper records. In Lesotho, the system was implemented to enhance patient care, track patients, and generate reports for evidence-based programming. It is imperative to understand how healthcare workers (HCWs) perceive the system as frontline end-users; thus, the aim of the study was to explore HCWs' perceptions of the system, focusing on perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) and factors influencing acceptance and utilization in Mafeteng district.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study design was conducted; 145 healthcare workers from 17 health facilities were invited to participate. The Technology Acceptance Model was incorporated into a self-administered questionnaire. The analysis employed descriptive statistics and the constructs of PU and PEU using Stata/BE 18.0. Multiple regression examined HCWs' perceptions, while verbatim text from participants clarified quantitative findings.
resultsThe study had a 49% response rate (n = 71). Most participants were female (70.42%; n = 50), with registered nurse midwives as the most common profession (45.07%; n = 32). A large proportion reported 'good' or 'very good' computer skills (43.66%; n = 31). For PU, 87.32% found the EMR system useful, 83.1% agreed it improves job performance, and 83.1% said it saves time. For PEU, 85.91% found the system easy to use, 81.69% could recover from errors, and 85% could remember task procedures. Network connectivity and electricity supply were cited as barriers to the effective use of the EMR system in health facilities, resulting in interruptions in service delivery. The characteristics of sex and profession had no significant impact on PU and PEU, while both qualification (p = 0.035) and computer skills (p = 0.007) were significant, indicating a positive association with greater PEU of the EMR system.
conclusionHCWs in the Mafeteng District exhibited positive attitudes toward the EMR system, recognising its usefulness, ease of use, and efficiency. Sustaining computer literacy and addressing infrastructural challenges could further enhance the successful implementation and adoption of the system, ultimately improving patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.